Thatcher: Ceremonial

Yes….I woke up this morning and Margaret Thatcher is still dead. To be honest, I have avoided news coverage as the parade of Thatcher sycophants from the1980s is irritating. Like so many vampires eulogising Dracula.

The Newsnight and various “specials” are much more interesting …especially the events surrounding her overthrow in 1990. But there is a certain amount of overkill…if you will pardon the phrase.

This is not a “royal” allegedly neutral person who died. This is not Lady Diana. Although Jim Davidson might be persuaded to sing “Candle in the Wind” at St Paul’s…but then that friend of Thatcher has more pressing things on his mind right now. Margaret Thatcher was not Mother of the British Nation …or even the Nations favourite Gran…like the oldQueen Mum….although in fairness at least one of them was a bit of a racist.

But newsreaders wearing black ties (Peter Sissons didn’t do that for the Queen Mum) or black dresses seems a bit over the top. Indeed it IS over the top. This is not a serving Prime Minister who was assassinated. This is a former Prime Minister who died at age of eighty seven.

The “royal” comparison is valid. This is a woman who said “we are a grandmother” which in fairness was more careless in a lI’ve TV moment but she became increasingly and laughably regal the longer she served. This was a Prime Minister who observed that the real “Queen” looked like the sort of person who voted for the SDP.

I am old enough to recall the funeral of Winston Churchill. I actually remember the cortège and a boat along the River Thames. But that as Churchill. Is the comparison with Churchill valid? I don’t think so….the notion that they were both war time prime ministers lies on the bizarre notion that Churchill came to power (unelected) in 1940 and led Britain against the Nazi menace is actually the same as Thatcher leading Britain against the mighty threat of Argentina.

Something in the Churchill funeral was war time era gratitude. A last farewell from the wartime generation….it ha ended only twenty tears earlier. But Churchill was a toff…a top toff….descended from the Duke of Marlborough no less…and the Brits like that kinda nonsense.

Thatcher was no toff. Not a real one. Of course she never lost a General Election. Churchill arguably never won a General Election.

But if I can recall Churchills funeral….I can’t actually recall the funerals of Alec Hume, Ted Heath, Harold Wilson and Jim Callaghan. An occasion for family and friends mostly. Certainly not a stat occasion or even a semi-state one. So Thatchers “ceremonial funeral” looks bizarre and even partisan.

Does covering her death and funeral to this absurd extent actually break the Representation of the People Act?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Thatcher: Ceremonial

  1. hoboroad says:

    A lot of people thought she and the Queen Of England didn’t get along because of politics. The truth is on a visit to Balmoral one summer Thatcher tried to do the washing-up something the Queen always did herself. The idea of two of the most powerful women in England fighting over this is hilarious.

  2. hoboroad says:

    I bet she threw a few dishes during her marriage to Ashley Cole!

  3. hoboroad says:

    Some Tory MP on Sky News earlier going on about Thatchers compassion. The two examples he gives for this are Mark Thatcher going missing in the desert and her crying when her fellow Tories showed her the door. Yeah she had a lot of compassion but only for herself and her own family.

  4. Political Tourist says:

    If the the Brits used a PR system of voting it’s doubtful any of us would have heard the name Thatcher.
    Btw, there wasn’t a lot of love loss for Churchill in many working class communities and the events at Gallipoli border on mass murder, of his own side.

    • Churchill never won an election…and yes I know about 1951…the Tories were helped by the National Liberals.
      He was pretty much detested in working class areas as Thatcher was.
      If there is a difference to Thatcher in terms of his funeral.
      1 He had been a genuine war leader…of a National Coalition.
      2 He was a toff.
      3 1965 was a more deferential age.
      But the thought of Thatcher on a gun carriage in a flag draped coffin, at an RAF Chapel suggests royalty and even a commander in chief.
      The notion that she is getting a funeral at taxpayers expense because she requested it is disgusting.
      And a slap in the face to people who are having benefits cut.

  5. hoboroad says:

    10 million pounds for her funeral and MP’s who are currently abroad can claim back air travel on expenses in order to get back for her funeral.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s