UTV Election Debate

So the Big Debate with five Party Leaders…Arlene Foster (DUP), Mike Nesbitt (UUP) Martin McGuinness (Sinn Féin), David Ford (Alliance) and Colum Eastwood (SDLP).

I enjoyed it despite it seeming very low-key. These Debates now seem to be part of the Election process itself. The whole point is not to screw up (nearly) live on TV.

So it is a “defensive” game for those with most to lose and an “attacking” game for those with most to gain.

The après-Debate is as much part of the process as the Debate itself. The Party “Tweeters” follow the lead of their Party “Spinners”. The pattern is always the same. Five Parties will claim that their man/woman won and the others lost.

So ….SDLP seem to think that Colum Eastwood was the best performer tonight. More to the point, a lot of neutrals seem to think he won.

In part, this is expected. The advisors would have told Martin McGuinness and Arlene Foster “dont screw up”. Both seemed nervy and seem uncomfortable when forced to defend their joint while trying to persuade people they have no connexion at all.

Mike Nesbitt did very well. In part because, he is not part of the governing coalition.

I am happy to report that David Ford performed poorly. He looked like a man who knew he would be resigning as Alliance Leader and going to House of Lords in the very near future. Alliance are guaranteed the Justice Ministry.Thanks to a shabby deal, it props up DUP-Sinn Féin. With the number of Departments being reduced, Alliance might be the big loser next month.

SDLP…Colum will have done himself a lot of good. His best lines have all been rehearsed over recent weeks. And he looked at ease.

These things are morale boosters. And SDLP feels pretty good tonight.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to UTV Election Debate

  1. Sinn Féin Supporter in Tyrone says:

    Eastwood was quite hesitant, looking down to read from his pre prepared notes in his opening statement.

    McGuinness was more assured, speaking without having to read from pre prepared notes and gave good replies to Eastwoods attacks.

    • I was trying to be restrained in my praise for Colum because I am a member of the Party and obviously I would be expected to say he did well.
      The key thing is what neutrals say and needless to say I am delighted. As is every SDLP member.
      McGuinness was very poor. Thats my reaction and just about every neutral thinks that also.
      Obviously youre a Sinn Féin supporter…you are quite open about that. So obviously SF supporters trying to spin his poor performance as a success is even more pleasurable.
      As a general rule the winning Party in these debates is the one who sits back and lets three losers (UUP did not lose either) spin.
      So …keep spinning.

      • Sinn Féin Supporter in Tyrone says:

        I thought McGuinness put Eastwood on the defensive by pointing to the SDLP;s failure to support the Fresh Start initiative. Also the 11+ debate, McGuinness was able to return volley very effectively.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s